LoanTap Credit Risk

Credit Portfolio Analytics

How the loan book scores today, in plain terms β€” where risk concentrates, whether the score is trustworthy, and what's driving it. Technical model detail lives in the collapsed panel at the bottom.

Risk tier mix

Every loan is grouped into one of four risk tiers based on its score. Actual historical default rates climb tier by tier β€” proof the score ranks risk correctly, not just a label.

TierLoansVolumeActual default rate

Loan explorer

Browse individual scored loans from the sample β€” search, filter, and see the same plain-English reasoning an underwriter would see, computed live from the model. Click a tier segment above to jump here filtered.

LoanAmountPurposeGradeTerm Risk scoreTierWhyPolicy

Loans at both ends

Concrete examples, not just statistics β€” clean Low-risk cases next to clear Very-High-risk cases, with the same reasoning underwriters would see. Outlier records (e.g. implausible income or public-record values) are filtered out so these stay representative.

βœ“ Low risk examples

β€Ό Very High risk examples

Where the risk concentrates

Default rate by segment β€” same scoring, sliced four ways.

By LoanTap grade

A (safest) β†’ G (riskiest) β€” LoanTap's own tiering, shown against actual outcomes

By loan purpose

Top categories by volume; remainder folded into "Other"

By home ownership

Renters default at a meaningfully higher rate than owners

By loan term

60-month loans default at roughly double the rate of 36-month loans

All segments, ranked

Sortable by any column. Rows outlined in red cross the 25% default-rate watch threshold.

Dimension Segment Loans Volume Default rate Status

Default rate over time

By year the loan was issued. The most recent years are understated β€” see note below the chart.

YearLoans issuedActual default rate

What's driving risk

Plain-English read of the model's strongest signals β€” translated from coefficients, not shown as raw numbers.

Pushes risk up

  • ↑ LoanTap's own grade / sub-grade assignment (expected β€” that's its job)
  • ↑ Higher debt-to-income ratio
  • ↑ 60-month terms, vs. 36-month
  • ↑ Higher revolving credit utilization
  • ↑ More open credit accounts

Pushes risk down

  • ↓ Higher annual income
  • ↓ Longer overall credit history (more total accounts)
  • ↓ Longer employment tenure
⚠ Flagged for governance review, not shown as a stated driver: a few signals β€” interest rate, and the "high-risk grade" flag β€” point the statistically "wrong" way once grade/sub-grade are already in the model. That's a known overlap artifact (grade already encodes the interest rate that was set), not a real causal effect, and shouldn't be read as "higher interest rate means lower risk."
For analysts β€” model metrics & methodology β–Ά
Underwriter WorkbenchCase-level review with plain-English reasoning and an AI-generated summary (grounding-checked before display).
Open workbench β†’